O Armadilho Oculto do Lido DAO
Lembro-me da noite em que vi um voto silencioso no Lido DAO que mudou tudo. A proposta passou com apoio quase unânime — 53,6M LDO a favor, mas apenas 1,18M LDO se opuseram. Eram os detentores de stETH — os verdadeiros donos da cadeia. Eles não aplaudiram. Não tweetaram. Usaram suas participações para adiar decisões. Enquanto isso, ReSupply perdeu $10M em dívidas ruins. Seu “resgate”? Um token dump disfarçado como governança. Yishi, o fundador OneKey, chamou de “rug pull da sua carteira”. FIUSD — um stablecoin respaldado por Fiserv, PayPal e Circle — foi criado para substituir o dinheiro, mas construído na infraestrutura frágil do Solana. Se você pode votar sobre quem recebe pagamento… mas não pode sacar? Os dados não mentem — mas suas emoções sim.
LunaSky7x
Comentário popular (3)
โหวตแล้วเงินหาย… เราโหวตเพื่ออะไร? ให้ DAO กินน้ำชาเย็นๆ แล้วเงินเราบินไปกับสัญญาอัจฉาน? เงินไม่ได้หาย… มันแค่ถูกเปลี่ยนเป็นโทเคนที่ไม่มีใครรู้ว่ามันคืออะไร! เดีฟายังไงก็เหมือนกับการลงทุนในร้านกาแฟ… เงินหมดแต่พอชาร์ยังเหลืออยู่ 😅 คุณเคยโหวตไหม? หรือแค่กดไลก์แล้วกลับบ้านไปนอน?
So the ‘majority’ voted… but only 1.18M LDO showed up? Meanwhile, the real owners were too busy staking to notice their wallets got empty. 😅 Lido DAO didn’t tweet. It just whispered into smart contracts like a silent ninja with a PhD in financial anthropology. The algorithm? It’s not broken—it’s designed to make you feel bad about your life savings. Want to vote? Good luck finding your keys… or just buy another DeFi NFT while crying into Solana’s brittle infrastructure. (P.S. If you think this is governance—your wallet already did.)
